SPATIAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF URBAN AREAS: METHODICAL APPROACHES TO DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING USING GEO-INFORMATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

  • A.L. Melnychuk
Keywords: spatial transformation, urban areas, field research, GIS, node of transformation

Abstract

The study of urban space transformations is intended to reflect its changes under the influence of the principal mainstream directions of development in a highly globalized world. The functional transformation of individual urban areas is possible through the mechanisms resulting in restructuring of spatial economic and settlement ties etc. The profound transformations of the compact areas within the Ukrainian cities in the post-Soviet period of development are related to the radical functional change of functions and constitute the derivative of the urban development transition through the crisis to new forms of existence. Modern cities represent a product of a long term development. Their territory is a repository and bearer of memory, the result of the preceding urban space organization, as well as the changes at the main historical-geographical cross-sections (i.e. development from crisis to crisis). In the more distant past, the duration of stable conditions and urban development regularities, determining the urban spatial development patterns, was quite significant. However, starting from the industrial burst and up to nowadays, this duration has begun to decline substantially. Under these conditions, field research remains a proven method to obtain reliable information and scientific results. This article focuses on new approaches to its implementation.

References

1. Мельничук А. Підходи до визначення історико-географічних зрізів формування та розвитку суспільно-географічного комплексу України. Історія української географії. 18. С. 90–96.
2. Melnychuk A., Khmelnytskyi O. Directions and peculiarities of territorial functional changes in a medium size Ukrainian town in the post-soviet period of development (case of Berdychiv). Економічна та соціальна географія. С. 68–74.
3. Melnychuk A., Kovalchuk S. Modern spatial transformation in Holosiivskyi district of Kyiv. Економічна та соціальна географія. С. 65–75.
4. Мельничук А.Л., Пальчук М.В. Процес джентрифікації в історичній частині Печерського райому міста Києва: суспільно-географічний аспект. Географія і сучасність. С. 197–202.
5. Мальчикова Д.С. Використання ГІС/ДЗЗ-технологій для вивчення територіальної структури землекористування. Проблеми безперервної географічної освіти і картографії. Х.: Харк. нац. ун-т ім. В.Н. Каразіна. 2010. Вип. 12. С. 123–128.
6. Topchiyev O.H., Malchykova D.S., Shashero, A.M. (2011), “Methodological principles and methodical scheme of spatial planning in regions”, Regional problems of Ukraine. “Metodolohichni pryntsypy ta metodychna skhema heoplanuvannya rehioniv”, Rehionalni problemy Ukrayiny. PP Vyshemyrskyy, Kherson. Р. 318–329.
7. 1. Пилипенко І.О., Мальчикова Д.С. Методи та методики суспільно-географічних досліджень: навчальний посібник. Херсон: ПП Вишемирський В.С., 2009. 156. С. 2.
8. Пилипенко І.О. Загальна характеристика методів суспільно-географічного аналізу систем типу «центр-периферія». Часопис соціально-економічної географії: міжрегіон.: зб. наук. праць. Харків, ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна, 2014. Вип. 17(2). С. 79–85.
9. Tuan Yi-Fu. Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective. Philosophy in Geography. Р. 387–427.
10. Ingold T. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. New York, Routledge, 2011. 253 c.
11. Ingold, T. 2010. Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.). 2010. Special issue: S. 121–139.
12. Olsen С.S., Hawkins H. Archiving an urban exploration – MR NICE GUY, cooking oil drums, sterile blister packs and uncanny bikinis. Сultural geographies. 2016. Vol 23. Issue 3. P. 531–543.
13. Cities Methodologies 2014: Walking Roundtable - Learning to Walk. URL: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/urbanlab/events/CM2014-walking-methodologiesroundtable
14. Creative Practice Primer project: A Walk Through the City. URL: https://experimentalnetwork.wordpress.com/creative-practice-primer-2/creativepractice-primer-project-walk/
15. DeSena J.N. The Gentrification and Inequality in Brooklyn: New Kids on the Block. Lexington Books.
P. 116.
16. Nuvolati G. (2009) Quality of Life in Cities: A Question of Mobility and Accessibility. In: Møller V., Huschka D. (eds) Quality of Life and the Millennium Challenge. Social Indicators Research Series. Vol 35. P. 177–191.
17. Mezentsev K., Pidgrushnyi G., Mezentseva N. Challenges of the Post-Soviet Development of Ukraine: Economic Transformations in Demographic Changes and Socio-Spatial Polarization Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization: Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond. 2015.
Published
2018-05-17
Pages
191-197
Section
SECTION 2 NATURAL-GEOGRAPHICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCHES