HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION AND FUNCTIONING OF THE TAFAL LANDSCAPES

  • O.V. Mishchenko
Keywords: tafal landscape, sacred landscape, cemetery, graveyard, necropolis, classification mark

Abstract

In the article a systematic analysis of the peculiarities of the formation and functioning of the tafal landscapes in the past and at the present stage of the development of society has been carried out. This research is of an interdisciplinary nature, since it uses scientific approaches of geography, history, and cultural studies. The tafal landscape is considered by the author as a type of a sacred one and is interpreted as a complex natural-man-made or anthropogenic system which has distinct boundaries and includes burial, natural, anthropogenic-man-made components, a person, or a group of people who, because of perceptual factors, consider such a system to be an object worship and respect. In the context of the study of the tafal landscapes, perceptual factors include the cultural, religious, ideological, individual, sacral perception of the landscape.

The author’s classification scheme of the tafal landscapes is formulated in the paper, where the investigated territorial systems can be classified according to the following characteristics: the characteristics of burial structures, periodization chronology, guard status. The author considered how the tafal landscapes were being changed in historical terms. Particular attention is paid to paleo tafal landscapes, which had a sacred meaning for people in recent times. Such landscapes are an objective chronicle of human development. In addition, most of the past history of the tafal landscapes are protected at world, national and local levels, which has not only scientific but also historical and cultural significance.

Modern tafal landscapes are formed on the outskirts of settlements and are characterized by an ordered (cluster) burial system, which depends on certain physical and geographical factors, in particular: hydrogeology, relief, and soils.

The features of the formation of modern Ukrainian cities and the specifics of their development led to the fact that the tafal landscapes that were created at different times were absorbed by the new architectural building and local infrastructure. The territory of the cemeteries that are being disappeared is used for the recreation, as well as for industrial and residential development. The study of this problem will be the purpose of our further research.

References

1. Археологічні пам’ятки Волинської області. (2017). Луцьк : Вежа-Друк [Archaeological sites of the Volyn region. (2017). Lutsk : Tower-Print (In Ukrainian)].
2. Бейдик, О.О. & Майборода, Н.В. (2008). Некрополі України: історія, територіальне поширення, функціональна структура, картографування. doi : http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/ktvsh_2008_13_17. pdf (дата звернення : 24.03.2019) [Beidyk, O.O. & Maiboroda, N.V. (2008). Necropolis of Ukraine: history, territorial distribution, functional structure, mapping. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/ktvsh_2008_13_17.pdf. (дата звернення : 24.03.2019) (In Ukrainian)].
3. Воловик, В.М. (2000). Тафальні ландшафти. Збірник наукових праць. Київ-Вінниця : Гіпаніс [Volovyk, V.M. (2000). Tafal landscapes, Collection of scientific works. Kiev-Vinnitsa : Hipanis (In Ukrainian)].
4. Bhardwaj, S. M. (1987) Geography and the hereafter. In V.S. Datye et al. (Ed.), Explorations in the Tropics (pp. 321–33). Pune : University of Poona.
5. Державні санітарні правила та норми «Гігієнічні вимоги щодо облаштування і утримання кладовищ в населених пунктах України». (1999). [State sanitary rules and norms «Hygienic requirements for the arrangement and maintenance of cemeteries in settlements of Ukraine». (1999) (In Ukrainian)]
6. Енциклопедія історії України. (2008) / В.А. Смолій (Ред.), (Т. 5). Київ : «Наукова думка» [Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History. (2008). V. A. Smolii (Ed.) (Vol. 5). Kyiv : « Scientific thought» (In Ukrainian)].
7. Етимологічний словник української мови. (1983) / О.С. Мельничук (Ред.), (Т. 2). Київ : Наук. думка [Etymological Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. (1983). O.S. Melnychuk (Ed.), (Vol. 2) Kiev : Nauk. dumka (In Ukrainian)].
8. Ефремов, И.А. (1940). Тафономия ‒ новая отрасль палеонтологи. Известия АН СССР. Серия. Биология, (3), 405–413 [Efremov, I.A. (1940). Taphonomy is a new branch of paleontologists. News of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Series. Biology, (3), 405–413 (In Russian)].
9. Жадько, В.А. Український некрополь. (2005). Київ : СПД Жадько В. О [Zhadko, V.A. Ukrainian necropolis. (2005). Kyiv : SPD Zhadko V.O (In Ukrainian)].
10. Захарук, Ю. (1956). Дослідження пам’яток доби бронзи та раннього заліза на Волині в 1950 р. Археологічні пам’ятки УРСР. (Т. 4) (С. 21–22). Київ : Ін-т археології Акад. наук УРСР [Zakharuk, Yu. (1956). In Archaeological monuments URSR. (Vol. 4) (pp. 21–22). Kyiv : In-t of Archeology Acad. Sciences URSR (In Ukrainian)].
11. Зубов, А. (2017). Доисторические и внеисторические религии. Москва : РИПОЛ класик [Zubov, A. (2017). Prehistoric and non-historic religions. Moscow : RIPOL klasik (In Russian)].
12. Кислий, О.Є. (2009). Мегаліти / В.А. Смолій (Ред.). Енциклопедія історії України. (Т. 6). Київ : Наукова думка [Kyslyi, O.Ye. (2009). Megaliths. In V.A. Smolij (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History. (Vol. 6) Kiev : Nauk. dumka (In Ukrainian)].
13. Кучинко, М.М. (2005). Археологія Волині. Луцьк : Вол. обл. друкарня [Kuchynko, M.M. (2005). Archeology of Volyn. Lutsk : Vol. obl. drukarnia (In Ukrainian)].
14. Kniffen, F. B. (1967) Necrogeography in the United States. Geographical Review 57, 426–427.
15. Марковин, В.И. (1978). Дольмены Западного Кавказа. Москва : Наука [Markovin, V.I. (1978). Dolmens of the Western Caucasus. Moscow : Science (In Russian)].
16. Міщенко, О.В. (2018). Водні джерела Волинської області в структурі сакрального ландшафту. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Серія: Географія. 72 (3), 88–93 [Mishchenko, O.V. (2018). The springs of Volyn region in the structure of the sacred landscape. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series : Geography. 72 (3), 88–93 (In Ukrainian)]. doi : http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2018.72.15 (дата звернення: 21.04.2019).
17. Park, C. C. (1994). Sacred Worlds. An introduction to geography and religion. London, New York : Routledge.
18. Смолій, В.А., Федорченко, В.К. & Цибух, В.І. (2006). Дольмен. Енциклопедичний словник-довідник з туризму. Київ : Видавничий Дім Слово [Smolii, V.A., Fedorchenko, V.K. & Tsybukh V.I. (2006). Dolmen. In Encyclopedic Dictionary-Tourist Guide. Kyiv : Publishing House Slovo (In Ukrainian)].
19. Скорий, С.А. & Кислий, О.Є. (2008) Курган, надмогильний пагорб / В.А. Смолій (Ред.). Енциклопедія історії України. (Т. 5). Київ : Наукова думка [Skoryi, S.A. & Kyslyi, O.Ye. (2008). Mound, the tall hill. In V.A. Smolii (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History. (Vol. 5) Kiev : Nauk. dumka (In Ukrainian)].
Published
2019-09-13
Pages
42-47
Section
SECTION 1 SOCIO-GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCHES