PLACE IDENTITY OF SELECTED LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF VINNYTSIA

O.M. Gnatiuk; A.L. Melnychuk

doi:10.32999/ksu2413-7391/2019-11-2

O.M. Gnatiuk
A.L. Melnychuk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2413-7391/2019-11-2

Keywords: place identity, place image, urban identity, urban location, perceptual portrait, Vinnytsia

Abstract

The article reveals the identity of individual locations of the Ukrainian city of Vinnytsia, undergoing rapid post-socialist transformation of the urban space. The information for the analysis was obtained through a sociological survey of city residents. Respondents were asked to give associations and images arising from the 12 selected locations that, according to the initial hypothesis, have either a powerful identity constituting a significant component of urban identity, or a ambiguous identity formed by multiple conflicting elements, or weak unbalanced identity that can be reinforced based on the historical and cultural potential of the location. Respondents’ responses were the subject of a content analysis aimed at determining the list of elementary associations associated with each location under study and the number of mentions of each association in the responses of all respondents. Each location was characterized in terms of the component structure of its identity: material environment, characteristics, emotions, activities. The structure of the perceived emotional load was also determined by the ratio of “positive”, “neutral” and “negative” associations. Complex associations, characterizing related elementary associations, were identified as well. The identity of each location was also characterized in terms of broadness and polarization.

The study showed that the considered urban locations have different models of identity development, influenced and specified by the characteristics of the material environment of the location, its architectural and planning completeness/integrity, intensity of involvement in public life, functioning as a public space of the city, historical and cultural significance. Most locations have a multi-level hierarchical structure of associated associations. A developed hierarchical structure is usually an indicator of a developed and balanced identity. The unbalanced identity structure is typical for the newly formed locations, as well as those marked by architectural and planning incompleteness and poor integration into the everyday life of the locals.

References

1. Agboola, O. P. (2017). The influence of open space utilization on residents’ attachment with community: A case study of rural market square in southwest Nigeria. Archnet-IJAR. 11(1). Р. 44–66.
2. Insch, A., & Florek, M. (2010). Place satisfaction of city residents: Findings and implications for city branding. In G. Ashworth and M. Kavaratzis (Eds.). Towards Effective Place Brand Management: Branding European Cities and Regions (pp. 191–204). Edward Elgar Publishing.
3. Karaman, A. (2001). Defining The Regional Identity: Conceptual Parameter of Urban Morphology. Journal of Research in Architecture & Planning, 1. Р. 70–88.
4. Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M.J. (2013): The dynamics of place brands: An identity-based approach to place branding theory. Marketing Theory, Vol. 13(1). Р. 69–86.
5. Melnychuk, A., & Gnatiuk, O. (2019). Public perception of urban identity in post-Soviet city: the case of Vinnytsia, Ukraine. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin. 68(1). Р. 37–50.
6. Mohapatra, B., & Razak, A. (2013). Place attachment and participation in management of neighbourhood green space: A place-based community management. International Journal of Sustainable Society. 5(3). Р. 266–283.
7. Molnár, V. (2013). Building the State. Architecture, Politics, and State Formation in Post- War Central Europe. London : Routledge.
8. Oktay, D., & Bala, H.A. (2015). A holistic research approach to measuring urban identity: findings from Girne (Kyrenia) area study. Archnet-IJAR, 9(2). Р. 201–215.
9. Paasi, A. (2013). Regional Planning and the Mobilization of ‘Regional Identity’: From Bounded Spaces to Relational Complexity. Regional Studies, 47, 1206–1219.
10. Pap, Á. (2013). Residential attitudes towards urban heritage in Budapest. Geographica Timisiensis. 22(1). Р. 17–32.
11. Roșu, L. (2015). The urban transformations of post-socialist city centre. The socialist relics and urban identity of Iasi historical city centre. Lucrarile Seminarului Geografic “Dimitrie Cantemir”, 40(1). Р. 159–170.
12. Saban Ökesli, D., & Gürçinar, Y. (2012). An investigation of urban image and identity. Findings from Adana. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 21(1). Р. 37–52.
13. Stober, D., & Cavrić, B. (2014). Dynamics and Aesthetics of Urban Change in Post–Socialist Osijek, Croatia. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture “The New ARCH”. 1(2). Р. 84–92.
14. Ter-Ghazaryan, D.K. (2013). “Civilizing the city center”: Symbolic spaces and narratives of the nation in Yerevan’s post-Soviet landscape. Nationalities Papers 41(4). Р. 570–589.
15. Young, C., & Kaczmarek, S. (2008). The Socialist Past and Postsocialist Urban Identity in Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Łódź, Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies. 15(1). Р. 53–70.
16. Замятин, Д.Н. (Ред.). (2008). Моделирование географических образов историко-культурной территории: методологические и теоретические подходы. Москва : Институт Наследия. [Zamiatin, D.N. (Ed.). (2008). Modeling of geographical images for historical and cultural areas: methodology and theory. Moscow : Heritage Institute. (In Russian)].
17. Злотин, В.Я. (2013). Ментальная карта Луганска: образ города в сознании студентов. Вісник ОНУ ім. І.І. Мечникова. Соціологія і політичні науки, 18(2), 267–273. [Zlotin, V.Ya. (2013). Mental map of Luhansk: the image of the city perceived by students. Bulletin of I. Mechnikov Odessa National University. Sociology and Political Sciences, 18(2), 267–273. (In Russian)].
18. Карповець, М.В. (2012). Міська ідентичність як відкритий проект людського буття. Гуманітарний часопис, 2, 20–27. [Karpovets, M.V. (2012). Urban identity as an open space of human existence. Humanitarian Bulletine, 2, 20–27. (In Ukrainian)].
19. Комаров, Р. (2008). Герой та пам’ятник герою як фактори ідентичності: приклад Донецька. Схід-Захід: Історико-культурологічний збірник, 9–10, 91–99. [Komarov, R. (2008). The hero and a memorial to the hero as identity factors: the case of Donetsk. East-West: Journal of History and Culture Studies, 9–10, 91–99. (In Ukrainian)].
20. Крылов, М.П. (2010). Региональная идентичность в Европейской России. Москва : Новый хронограф, 2010. [Krylov, M.P. (2010). Regional identity in European Russia. Moscow : Novyi Hronograf, 2010. (In Russian)].
21. Митин, И. (2017). Ментальные карты города: история понятия и разнообразие подходов. Городские исследования и практики, 2(3), 64–79. [Mitin, I. (2017). Urban mental maps: the history of the concept and diversity of approaches. Urban Studies and Practices, 2 (3), 64–79. (In Russian)].
22. Мезенцев, К.В., & Мезенцева, Н.І. (2005). Перцепційні портрети регіонів України. Регіональні проблеми України: географічний аналіз та пошук шляхів вирішення (с. 208–213). Херсон. [Mezentsev, K.V., & Mezentseva, N.I. (2005). Perceptual portraits of Ukrainian regions. Regional problems in Ukraine: geographical analysis and search for solutions (pp. 208–213). Kherson. (In Ukrainian)].
23. Мусієздов, О.О. (2015). Пам’ять та міська ідентичність: спроби поєднання у контексті концепції уявлених спільнот. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія соціологічна, 9, 57–66. [Musiyezdov, O.O. (2015). Memory and urban identity: an attempt to unite in the view of imaginary society conception. Bulletin of Lviv University. Sociology Series, 9, 57–66. (In Ukrainian)].
24. Обухова, Н.О. (2010). Структура символічного простору в образі великого міста (на прикладі м. Донецьк). Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Соціологія, 1–2, 84–87. [Obukhova, N.O. (2010). Structure of symbolical space in the image of the big city (case of Donetsk). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.Sociology, 1–2, 84–87. (In Ukrainian)].
25. Олійник, Я.Б., Гнатюк, О.М. (2017). Територіальна ідентичність населення Подільського регіону. Київ : ВПЦ «Київський університет». [Oliynyk, Ya.B., Gnatiuk, O.M. (2017). Territorial identity of the population of Podolia. Kyiv: Kyiv University. (In Ukrainian)].
26. Черкес, Б.С., Юрик, Я.М. (2013). Методологічні основи дослідження міської ідентичності та її об’єктів-символів. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія : Архітектура, 757, 3–6. [Cherkes, B.S., Yuryk, Ya.M. (2013). Methodological grounds for the study of urban identity and its symbols. Bulletin of the National Polytechnic University of Lviv. Architecture, 757, 3–6. (In Ukrainian)].