USE OF RECREATIONAL RESOURCES OF COASTAL TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES

  • D.S. Malchykova
  • I.O. Pylypenko
  • H.Yu. Napadovska
Keywords: decentralization, territorial community, coastal region, recreational resources, tourist cluster, Kherson region

Abstract

The article proposed an analysis of new opportunities for managing recreational resources of coastal territorial communities of Ukraine in the context of decentralization processes and modern political, socio-economic and environmental challenges. The dynamics of decentralization processes and territorial communities’ formation in 2015–2019 are analyzed in the article, differences in the course of decentralization of coastal territorial communities in Ukraine and Kherson region have been established on a comparative analysis. It’s substantiated that tourism demand, and subsequently the local economy, is significantly affected by both unexpected emergencies (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) and projected current climate change, which could adversely affect disruption of access to recreational resources and change physical conditions, including conditions of adaptation and recovery of the human body. The effects of climate change create additional challenges and uncertainties, and can significantly transform both coastal areas and social interaction in coastal communities.

The article substantiates that the potential of coastal territorial communities’ recreational resources makes it possible to improve their financial capacity by filling local budgets through the development of the relevant territories. The perspectives of local socio-economic development, new economic opportunities and directions of tourism and recreational capacities using through international partnership are identified on the case of Kherson region, including involvement of Kherson region and certain territorial communities in the international project “Decentralization brings better results and efficiency” (DOBRE). The impact of the DOBRE program on the development of the tourism and recreational sector of the Kherson region is analyzed, including the formation of a tourist cluster formed after the unification of territorial communities, the purpose of its creation and the main directions of work. On the basis of the conducted research the key problems and prospects of local economic development are identified. They can be solved through international partnerships and strategic planning using the tourism capacity and development of coastal territorial communities.

References

1. Amundsen, H. (2015). Place attachment as a driver of adaptation in coastal communities in Northern Norway. Local Environment, 20(3), 257–276. (in English). DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.838751 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
2. Barron, S., Canete, G., Carmichael, J., Flanders, D., Pond, E., Sheppard, S., & Tatebe, K. (2012). A climate change adaptation planning process for low-lying, communities vulnerable to sea level rise. Sustainability, 4(9), 2176–2208. (in English). DOI: 10.3390/su4092176 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
3. Clarke, B., Stocker, L., Coffey, B., Leith, P., Harvey, N., Baldwin, C., Cannard, T. (2013). Enhancing the knowledge-governance interface: Coasts, climate and collaboration. Ocean and Coastal Management, 86, 88–99. (in English). DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.009 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
4. Decentralisation Reform. Regions. (2020). URL: https://decentralization.gov.ua/gromada [Реформа децентралізалізації. Регіони. (2020). Retrieved from: https://decentralization.gov.ua/gromada (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
5. Decentralisation: International Cooperation. (2020). URL: https://donors.decentralization.gov. ua/project/dobre [Децентралізація: міжнародна співпраця. (2020). Retrieved from: https://donors. decentralization.gov.ua/project/dobre (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
6. Dredge, D. (2010). Place change and tourism development conflict: Evaluating public interest. Tourism Management, Vol. 31(1), 104–112. (in English). DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.01.004 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
7. Farmsteads of rural green tourism (2020). URL: https://grygorivska-gromada.gov.ua/sadibisilskogo- zelenogo-turizmu-1525724246/ [Садиби сільського зеленого туризму. (2020). Retrieved from: https://grygorivska-gromada.gov.ua/sadibi-silskogozelenogo- turizmu-1525724246/ (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
8. Geoportal of the administrative-territorial system of Ukraine (2019). URL: http://atu.minregion. gov.ua/ua/home [Геопортал адміністративно-територіального устрою України (2019). Retrieved from: http://atu.minregion.gov.ua/ua/home (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
9. In the Kherson region will create a new touristrecreation cluster. (2018). URL: http://pivdenukraine. com.ua/2018/03/05/na-xersonshhini-stvoryat-novijturistichno- ozdorovchij-klaster/ [На Херсонщині створять новий туристично-оздоровчий кластер. (2018). Retrieved from: http://pivdenukraine.com. ua/2018/03/05/na-xersonshhini-stvoryat-novijturistichno- ozdorovchij-klaster/ (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
10. Jurjonas, M. & Seekamp, E. (2020). A commons before the sea: climate justice considerations for coastal zone management. Climate and Development, 12(3), 199–203. (in English). DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1611533 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
11. Malchykova, D., Gukalova, I., Omelchenko, N., Napadovska, H. (2019). Integrated coastal zone management: restrictions and priorities of development, the implementation of administrative and territorial organization reform. The 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. (SGEM, 19 (5.1), 2019) 407–414. (in English). DOI: 10.5593/ sgem2019/5.1/S20.051 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
12. Malchykova, D.S., Bielaia, I.S. Decentralization practice in the Кherson region: territorial community resources and land management problems. Odesa National University Herald. Geography and Geology, 25, 1 (36). 110–125 [Мальчикова, Д.С., Бєлая, І.С. (2020) Практика децентралізації в Херсонській області: територіальні ресурси громад і проблеми землеустрою. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Географічні та геологічні науки, 25, 1 (36). 110–125 (in Ukrainian)]. DOI: 10.18524/2303- 9914.2020.1(36).205171 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
13. Mashkova, O., Napadovska, Н. (2018). Prospects of tourism development in the united national territorial communities of Kherson region. Scientific and practical collection of Kyiv National University T. Shevchenko. Series: Geography and Tourism. (42) [Машкова, О.В., Нападовська, Г.Ю. (2018). Перспективи розвитку туризму в об’єднаних територіальних громадах Херсонської області. Науково-практичний збірник Київського національного університету ім. Т. Шевченка. Серія: Географія і туризм. (42) (in Ukrainian)].
14. McElduff, L., & Ritchie, H. (2018). Fostering coastal community resilience: mobilising peopleplace relationships. Area, 50, 186– 194. (in English). DOI: 10.1111/area.12419 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
15. Mestanza-Ramón, C., Capa, S., Saavedra, F., Paredes, R. (2019). Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Continental Ecuador and Galapagos Islands: Challenges and Opportunities in a Changing Tourism and Economic Context. Sustainability. (in English). DOI: 10.3390 / su11226386 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
16. Moser, S.C., Williams, S.J., & Boesch, D.F. (2012). Wicked challenges at land’s end: managing coastal vulnerability under climate change. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 37, 51–78. (in English). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environment-021611-135158 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
17. Napadovska, H.Yu., Pylypenko, I.O. (2018). Spatial analysis of the process of association of territorial communities. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. Kharkiv: Karazin Kharkiv National University, 181–183. [Нападовська, Г.Ю., Пилипенко, І.О (2018). Просторовий аналіз процесу об’єднання територіальних громад, Матері- али міжнародної науково-практичної конференції. Харків: ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна. (м. Харків, 8–9 листопада, 2018 р.). Харків : ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна, 181–183. (in Ukrainian)].
18. Napadovska, Н. (2019). Features of agricultural development in the context of decentralization (in the case of the Кherson region). Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series “Geographical Sciences”, (10), 48–55 [Нападовська, Г.Ю. (2019). Особливості сільського розселення в контексті децентралізації (на прикладі Херсонської області). Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: географічні науки, (10), 48–55. (in Ukrainian)]. DOI: 10.32999/ksu2413-7391/2019- 10-7 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
19. Oliynyk, Ya.B., Ostapenko, P.O. (2016). Formation of capable local communities in Ukraine: benefits, risks, threats. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, (4), 37–43. [Олійник, Я.Б., Остапенко, П.О. (2016). Формування спроможних територіальних громад в Україні: переваги, ризики, загрози. Український гео- графічний журнал, (4), 37–43. (in Ukrainian)].
20. On Approving the Concept of Reforming Local Self-Government and Territorial Organization of Government in Ukraine: the order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2014). URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80#Tex [Про схвалення Концепції реформування місцевого самоврядування та територіальної організації влади в Україні. (2014). Retrieved from: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333-2014-%D1%80#Text (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
21. Ormaza, F. & Castro, D. (2020). COVID-19 impacts on beaches and coastal water pollution: Management proposals post pandemic. (in English) DOI: 10.13140 / РГ.2.2.29115.23841 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
22. Seekamp, E., Jurjonas, M. & Bitsura- Meszaros, K. (2019) Influences on coastal tourism demand and substitution behaviors from climate change impacts and hazard recovery responses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(5), 629–648 (in English). DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1599005 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
23. Tavriya tourist cluster – new opportunities of tourist Kherson. (2014). URL: https://khoda. gov.ua/tavricheskijj-turisticheskijj-klaster-novyevozmojnosti- turisticheskojj-hersonshhiny1-uk [«Таврійський туристичний кластер» – нові можливості туристичної Херсонщини (2014). Retrieved from: https://khoda.gov.ua/tavricheskijj-turisticheskijjklaster- novye-vozmojnosti-turisticheskojjhersonshhiny1- uk (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
24. Tourism development in new communities, tourist hub. (2018). URL: http://decentralization. uacrisis.org/tourhub [Розвиток туризму в умовах нових громад, туристичний хаб. (2018). Retrieved from: http://decentralization.uacrisis.org/tourhub (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
25. Udovychenko, V., Melnychuk, A., Gnatiuk, O., Ostapenko, P. (2017). Decentralization reform in Ukraine: assessment of the chosen transformation model, European Spatial Research and Policy (24,1) (in English). DOI: 10.1515/esrp-2017-0002 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
26. Ukraine’s Sustainable Development Strategy till 2030. Project. (2017). URL: https://www.undp. org/content/dam/ukraine/docs/SDGreports/UNDP_ Strategy_v06-optimized.pdf [Стратегія розвитку України до 2030 року. Проєкт. (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/ukraine/ docs/SDGreports/UNDP_Strategy_v06-optimized. pdf (in Ukrainian)] (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
27. Walsh, C., Döring, M. (2018). Cultural geographies of coastal change. Area, 50, 2, 146–149. (in English). DOI: 10.1111/area.12434 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
28. Yeh, S.-S. (2020). Tourism recovery strategy against COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism Recreation Research. 1(7). DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2020.1805933 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
29. Zenker, S., Kock, F.. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic – a critical discussion of a tourism research agenda. Tourism Management. 81. 104164. (in English). DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104164 (дата звернення: 22.08.2020).
Published
2020-12-10
Pages
54-62
Section
SECTION 1 SOCIO-GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCHES