METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO PROVIDING DATA FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL PLANNING OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article identifies an urgent problem of ensuring advanced local development, namely, providingreliable and complete data for planning and achieving local development. The article analyzes thepeculiarities of the structure and obtaining data for planning, programming, implementation of measures,monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of local development. The problems of the system ofproviding territorial hromadas of the basic territorial level with reliable and complete data that characterizelocal development and determine the activities of local authorities to achieve the development of thelocal economy are identified. The article discusses the algorithms for selecting and analyzing satelliteimages of territorial hromadas as a source of collecting reliable data on their development, defines theirsystem and interconnectedness, and describes the tools for verifying the data obtained during satelliteimage processing. The tools and methods for obtaining statistical data as a result of expeditions and fieldresearch directly in the hromada are identified. The experience of planning and project organizations inobtaining data is used for analysis in the context of the crisis of local statistics organization, the increasingrole of digitalization in this area, and the formation of local self-government in the post-socialist periodunder the influence of the results of the reform of the administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine.The proposed approaches to providing statistical data on the development of the territory on the example of territorial hromada of Kyiv region, their spatial organization and presentation in the form of GISare proposed. The obtained data are analyzed using GIS tools. The presentation of spatially organizedstatistical data reflecting the state of development of territorial hromada in the form of a dashboard inthe environment of the developed GIS, adapted to the needs of the management decision-making systembased on a participatory approach. The insufficient level of governmental support for the formationof a modern statistical base for local development is indicated. The features and problems of resourceprovision for further accelerated socio-economic development of territorial hromadas in the region areillustrated on the example of territorial hromada.
References
2. Маруняк Є.О. (2018). Геопросторові дослідження і практика планування: Україна на тлі світових трендів. Київ : Фенікс, 336 c. [Marunyak, Y.O. 2018). Geospatial Research and Planning Practice: Ukraine in the Context of Global Trends – Kyiv: Phoenix, 336 p. (in Ukrainian)].
3. Мезенцев К.В, Провотар Н.І., Пальчук М.В. (2020). Публічні простори через призму партисипативного міського планування – приклад Києва. Український географічний журнал, 2, 30–37. [Mezentsev, K.V., Provotar, N.I., & Palchuk, M.V. (2020). Public spaces through the lens of participatory urban planning: The case of Kyiv. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 2, 30-37. doi:10.15407/ugz2020.02.030 (in Ukrainian)].
4. Мельничук А.Л., Гнатюк С.С. (2021) Практики та інструменти зворотного зв’язку у територіальних громадах: Просування ГІС-інструментів як сервісів взаємодії. Регіон – 2021: стратегія оптимального розвитку: матеріали міжнародної науковопрактичної конференції (м. Харків, 21 жовтня 2021 р.) / Гол. ред. колегії Л.М. Нємець. Харків : ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна. С. 152 – 154.
[Melnychuk, A.L., & Hnatiuk, S.S. (2021). Practices and tools of feedback in territorial communities: Promoting GIS tools as interaction services. In Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Region-2021: Strategy of Optimal Development". Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. 152-154 p. (in Ukrainian)].
5. Руденко Л.Г., Лісовський С.А., Маруняк Є.О. (2016). Екологічний імператив у пріоритетах інтегрованого планувального процесу в Україні. Український географічний журнал, 2016, с. 9–16.
[Rudenko, L.G., Lisovskyi, S.A., & Marunyak, Y.O. (2016). The ecological imperative in the priorities of the integrated planning process in Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 2016(4), 9-16. doi:10.15407/ugz2016.04.009 (in Ukrainian)].
6. Топчієв О.Г., Стефанович А.М. (2011). Планування території як складова стратегії соціально-економічного розвитку адміністративно-територіальних одиниць базового рівня і територіальних громад. Теоретичні та прикладні питання державотворення, (8), с. 448–459. [Topchiev, O.G., & Stefanovich, A.M. (2011). Territory planning as a component of the strategy for socioeconomic development of basic-level administrative-territorial units and territorial communities. Theoretical and Applied Issues of State Building, (8), 448-459 p. (in Ukrainian)].
7. Malchykova, D. (2021). Participatory budgeting practices and civic activism for urban space renovation: the case of Kherson. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya / Економічна та соціальна географія, 85, 38–48. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.38-48.
8. Melnychuk, A., Denysenko, O., & Ostapenko, P. (2021). New tools for new urban spaces? Analyses of planning and participation tools and their performance in (post)transitional perspective. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya / Економічна та соціальна географія, 85, 11–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.11-22.
9. Mezentsev, K., Pidgrushnyi, G., Mezentseva, N. (2015). Challenges of the Post-Soviet Development of Ukraine: Economic Transformations, Demographic Changes and Socio-Spatial Polarization. In: Lang, T., Henn, S., Sgibnev, W., Ehrlich, K. (eds) Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization. New Geographies of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415080_14.
10. Pambudi, A. S. (2022). Balancing infrastructure, ecosystem conservation, and community approaches on integrated development planning of Citarum Watershed. Indonesian Journal of Applied Environmental Studies, 3(1), 34–41. DOI: 10.33751/injast.v3vi1i.4209.
11. Provotar, N. & Ohiichuk, N. (2021). Public spaces of Zhytomyr: a places that encourages residents to go out to the city. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya. Економічна та соціальна географія, 86, 40–52. URL: https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.86.40-52.
