VISITOR CENTERS OF UKRAINIAN NATIONAL NATURE PARKS: ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND CONTENT DIVERSITY
Abstract
This paper examines the spatial distribution and functional diversity of visitor centres within thesystem of National Nature Parks of Ukraine in the context of sustainable development, environmentaleducation, and communication between protected area administrations, local communities, and visitors. Visitor centres are considered as key institutional components of park infrastructure that supportinformation provision, environmental awareness, recreation management, and regulation of visitorflows. The study is based on a comprehensive interdisciplinary methodology combining retrospectiveanalysis, spatial analysis, content analysis of open information sources, and typological classification.A spatial assessment of 55 national nature parks was conducted using the framework of major touristregions of Ukraine, revealing a pronounced territorial imbalance in the distribution of visitor centres. Theresults show that only about one third of parks possess fully established visitor centres, while a significantproportion operate partially or remain temporarily closed due to the impacts of military actions andoccupation. Content analysis identified substantial variation in functional capacity, infrastructure, andoperational status of existing centres. Based on functional characteristics, three main types of visitorcentres were distinguished: informational centres with minimal infrastructure, classical centres withexhibition facilities, and multifunctional interactive centres combining educational, exhibition, andvisitor service functions. Informational centres dominate the national network and primarily serve asbasic points of orientation and information. The most advanced multifunctional models are concentratedin the Carpathian and Podillian tourist regions and are largely the result of targeted investments andinternational cooperation projects. The findings highlight systemic disparities in the developmentof visitor centre infrastructure across Ukraine and indicate a strong dependence on external funding,regional governance capacity, and geopolitical conditions. The study substantiates the need for unifiedstrategic approaches to planning, functional zoning, and modernization of visitor centres in accordancewith international standards in order to strengthen environmental education, visitor management, andsustainable use of protected areas. The article highlights that.
References
2. Carr, E. (2007). Mission 66: Modernism and the National Park Dilemma in the United States, 1945-1972. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/30086
3. Eagles, P. F. J., McCool, S. F., & Haynes, C. D. (2002). Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. IUCN–The World Conservation Union.
4. Habchak, N. F., & Dubis, L. F. (2022). Analysis of ecotourism infrastructure within the nature‑protected areas of the Transcarpathian region (on the example of National Nature Park “Synevyr”). Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 31(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.15421/112203
5. Habchak, N., & Dubis, L. (2023). Uzhanskyi National Nature Park: Features of the ecotourism infrastructure and development prospects. Geography and Tourism, (71), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.17721/2308-135x.2023.71.20‑27
6. Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Fulcrum Publishing.
7. Kajala, L. (Ed.). (2006). Monitoring Outdoor Recreation in the Nordic and Baltic Countries (TemaNord 2006:530). Nordic Council of Ministers.
8. Karpenko, Y. (2020). Infrastructure and educational activities in national parks of Ukraine. Studia Quaternaria, 37(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.24425/sq.2020.133723
9. Karpenko, Y. (2020). Mezyn National Natural Park as a centre of paleoecological and ecotourism activity. Studia Quaternaria, 37(1), 45–60. Retrieved from https://www.studia.quaternaria.pan.pl/pdfs/sq37-1/3_Karpenko.pdf
10. Leal-Filho, W., et al. (2024). Sustainable management of protected areas: Lessons from Europe and beyond. Journal of Environmental Management, 358, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120567
11. Leung, Y.-F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, G. T., & Buckley, R. (2018). Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines for sustainability. IUCN–International Union for Conservation of Nature.
12. National Park Service. (n.d.). Mission 66 and the development of the national park visitor center. NPS History eLibrary. https://npshistory.com/publications/allaback/intro.htm
13. SEPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). (2021). Naturum – Sweden’s nature centres. https://www.swedishepa.se
14. State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine. (2023). Statistical materials on protected areas and forest management. https://forest.gov.ua
15. USA Національна паркoва служба США (National Park Service). (2019). NPS visitor use statistics. https://irma.nps.gov/STATS
16. WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). (2023). Reports and projects on ecological education and sustainable tourism in Ukraine. https://wwf.ua
17. Бейдик О.О. (2001) Рекреаційно-туристичні ресурси України: методологія та методика аналізу, термінологія, районування. – К.: КНУ ім. Т. Шевченка, 2001. – 395 с. [Beydyk, O. O. (2001). Recreational and Tourism Resources of Ukraine: Methodology and Methods of Analysis, Terminology, and Zoning. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 395 p.] (in Ukrainian).
18. Екотуристичний візит-центр Карпатського національного природного парку успішно пройшов екологічну сертифікацію за стандартом «Зелений офіс» [Електронний ресурс] / Без автора // Жива планета. – 2 квітня 2021 р. – Режим доступу: https://www.ecolabel.org.ua/ekoturistichnij-vizit-tsentr-karpatskogonatsionalnogo-prirodnogo-parku-uspishno-projshovekologichnu-sertifikatsiyu-za-standartom-zelenijofis (дата звернення: 03.08.2025). [Eco-tourism Visitor Center of the Carpathian National Nature Park Successfully Passed Environmental Certification under the “Green Office” Standard. (2021, April 2). Living Planet. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved August 3, 2025, from https://www.ecolabel.org.ua/ekoturistichnijvizit-tsentr-karpatskogo-natsionalnogo-prirodnogoparku-uspishno-projshov-ekologichnu-sertifikatsiyu-zastandartom-zelenij-ofis] (in Ukrainian).
19. Закон України «Про природно-заповідний фонд України» № 2456-XII від 16 червня 1992 року (із змінами). (1992). Відомості Верховної Ради України, 34, ст. 502. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-12 [Law of Ukraine “On the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine” No. 2456-XII of June 16, 1992 (as amended). (1992). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 34, Art. 502. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-12] (in Ukrainian).
20. Котик, І. (2021). Екотуризм як чинник сталого розвитку національних парків України. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Т. Шевченка. Географія, 75(1), 23–31. [Kotyk, I. (2021). Ecotourism as a Factor of Sustainable Development of National Parks of Ukraine. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geography, 75(1), 23–31] (in Ukrainian).
21. Міністерство довкілля та природних ресурсів України. (2023). Офіційний перелік національних природних парків України. https://mepr.gov.ua [Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2023). Official List of National Nature Parks of Ukraine.https://mepr.gov.ua] (in Ukrainian).
22. Національний природний парк «Подільські Товтри» [Електронний ресурс] // Офіційний сайт. URL: https://www.npptovtry.org.ua/ (дата звернення: 03.08.2025). [Podilski Tovtry National Nature Park. Official website. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved August 3, 2025, from https://www.npptovtry.org.ua/] (in Ukrainian).
23. Омельченко Н.В. Запровадження та розбудова «Візит-центрів» – як перспективний напрямок розвитку національних природних парків Нижнього Подніпров’я на після воєнному етапі / Н.В. Омельченко, О.В. Давидов // Міжнародна науково-практична конференція “Катастрофа Каховського водосховища: перспектива майбутнього", 2025. – С. 19-20. [Omelchenko, N. V., & Davydov, O. V. (2025). Implementation and Development of Visitor Centers as a перспективний Direction for the Development of National Nature Parks of the Lower Dnipro Region in the Post-War Period. In Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “The Kakhovka Reservoir Disaster: Future Prospects” (pp. 19–20).] (in Ukrainian).
24. Офіційний сайт Карпатського національного природного парку https://cnnp.if.ua/ [Carpathian National Nature Park. Official website. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved August 3, 2025, fromhttps://cnnp.if.ua/] (in Ukrainian).
25. Офіційний сайт Мезинського національного природного парку https://mezinpark.com.ua/ [Mezyn National Nature Park. Official website. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved August 3, 2025, from https://mezinpark.com.ua/ ] (in Ukrainian).
26. Офіційний сайт Слобожанського національного природного парку http://slobozhanskyi.in.ua/[Slobozhanskyi National Nature Park. Official website. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved August 3, 2025, from http://slobozhanskyi.in.ua/] (in Ukrainian).
27. Павлюк, О. (2023). Еколого-просвітницька діяльність національних парків України: сучасний стан та перспективи розвитку. Український географічний журнал, 3(115), 42–51. [Pavliuk, O. (2023). Environmental Education Activities of National Parks of Ukraine: Current State and Development Prospects. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3(115), 42–51] (in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
