RECENT MORPHODYNAMICS AND CLOSURE IMPLICATIONS OF A NON-TIDAL INLET: LAZURNENSKA PRORVA, BLACK SEA COAST, UKRAINE

Keywords: ephemeral inlets, coastal barrier, non-tidal seas, tidal seas, non-tidal inlets, prorva

Abstract

Ephemeral inlets are important and specific components of the coastal barriers of the World Ocean. Withintidal coasts, the corresponding channels are called tidal inlets, and within non-tidal coasts – breaches (prorvas,promoiny, prorany). Ephemeral inlets are important for the development of coastal barrier systems. First ofall, they perform the function of hydrological control, determining the features and scale of water exchangebetween the water bodies adjacent to the barrier. The function of ephemeral inlets aimed at determining thevolume and direction of coastal and marine sediment movement is called geological control. The peculiaritiesof the movement of different species of plants and animals through ephemeral inlets are called ecologicalcontrol. In this context, the parameters of the studied inlets, the duration of their functioning, and thefrequency of closure and opening determine the specific conditions of the adjacent water bodies.Within the coastal barriers of the non-tidal seas, ephemeral inlets most often occur and function for along period of time within the accumulative forms of the Tendra-Dzharylgach system. The correspondingbarrier is characterized by a certain variety of prorvas associated with the hydrodynamic conditions ofthe adjacent water bodies.Among all the prorvas of the above coastal system, the Lazurnenska prorva is the most famous. Itshould be noted that this name should be understood as all ephemeral inlets that periodically appearedand functioned in the root part of the Dzharylgach Spit. Interest in the Lazurnenska prorva increased afternews of its artificial closure spread through a significant number of Ukrainian information resources.Information about the peculiarities of the emergence and functioning of the Lazurnenska prorva isbased on certain field materials from almost sixty years ago (Pravotorov I., Shuisky Y., Kotovsky I.,Vykhovanetz G., and Davydov O.). The available historical and cartographic material, which coversapproximately two hundred and thirty years, allows us to determine the frequency and duration of thefunctioning of the breaches. The available satellite images make it possible to determine the patterns ofevolution of the studied breach over a forty-year period. The Lazurnenska prorva has certain dynamic trends throughout the year. In the cold season, whenwaves and wind currents from the east and northeast dominate, the breach widens and deepens. In thewarm season, when waves and wind currents from the west and southwest become more active, thebreach channel narrows.In June 2022, it was determined that the studied prorvas was closed (based on satellite imagesanalysis). The analysis indicates that there is a natural tendency for the prorvas closure, but we do nothave reliable information on the main reason for the closure. At the beginning of June 2023, the breachhas been closed for a year. Under the conditions of long-term closure or artificial maintenance of thiscondition, very unfavorable consequences will occur within Dzharylgach Bay.

References

1. Bond, J., Green, A.N., Cooper, J.A.G., Humphries, M.S., (2013). Seasonal and episodic variability in the morphodynamics of an ephemeral inlet, Zinkwazi Estuary, South Africa. Journal of Coastal Research 65 (sp.1), 446–451. URL: https://doi.org/10.2112/SI65-076.1.
2. Buynevich, I. V., FitzGerald, D. M. (2018). Barrier Island Landforms. В C. W. Finkl & C. Makowski (Ред.), Encyclopedia of Coastal Science (сс. 1–10). Springer International Publishing. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_367-1.
3. Buynevich, I.V., and Davydov, O. (2023). Crosssectional morphometry and georadar signature of small non-tidal inlet (prorva) channels, Black Sea, Ukraine. Eurasian Scientific Discussions, Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Barca Academy Publishing, Barcelona, Spain, 214–218.
4. Cooper, J.A.G. (1990). Ephemeral streammouth bars at flood-breach river mouths: comparison with ebb-tidal deltas at barrier inlets. Marine Geology 95, 57–70.
5. Davydov, O., Buynevich, I.V., (2023). Morphological diversity of non-tidal inlet (prorva) channels. Proceedings of the 15th Marine Science and Technology Conference, Klaipėda University Press, Lithuania, 41–45.
6. Davydov, O., Karaliūnas V. (2022). Genetic diversity of inlet systems along non-tidal coasts: examples from the Black Sea and Sea of Azov (Ukraine). Baltica, 35(2), 125–139. URL: https://doi. org/10.5200/baltica.2022.2.3.
7. FitzGerald, D. M. (1996). Geomorphic Variability and Morphologic and Sedimentologic Controls on Tidal Inlets. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. SI, № 23, 47–71.
8. FitzGerald, D.M., Buynevich, I.V., (2018). Tidal Inlets. In: Finkl C., Makowski C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Coastal Science. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_316-2.
9. FitzGerald, D.M., Buynevich, I.V., and Hein, C.J., (2012). Morphodynamics and facies architecture of tidal inlets and tidal deltas. In Davis, R.A., Jr. and Dalrymple, R.W., (eds.). Principles of Tidal Sedimentology, Springer Verlag, pp. 301–333.
10. Gudelis, V. (1993). Jūros krantotyros terminų žodynas. Vilnius: Academia: 408 [Gudelis, V. (1993). A Glossary of Coastal Research Terms. Vilnius : Academia: 408]. [In Lithuanian].
11. Hayes, M. O., FitzGerald, D. M., (2013). Origin, Evolution, and Classification of Tidal Inlets. In: Kana, T.; Michel, J., and Voulgaris, G. (eds.), Proceedings, Symposium in Applied Coastal Geomorphology to Honor Miles O. Hayes, Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 69.
12. Lucke J.B. (1934). Tidal inlets: A theory of evolution of lagoon deposits on shorelines of emergence. Journal Geology. 42 p.
13. McBride, R. A., Anderson, J. B., Buynevich, I. V., Cleary, W., Fenster, M. S., FitzGerald, D. M., Harris, M. S., Hein, C. J., Klein, A. H. F., Liu, B., de Menezes, J. T., Pejrup, M., Riggs, S. R., Short, A. D., Stone, G. W., Wallace, D. J., & Wang, P. (2013). 10.8 Morphodynamics of Barrier Systems: A Synthesis. В Treatise on Geomorphology (сс. 166–244). Elsevier. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00279-7.
14. Seminack, C.T. and Buynevich, I.V., 2013. Sedimentological and geophysical signatures of a relict tidal inlet complex along a wave-dominated barrier: Assateague Island, Maryland. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 83, 132–144.
15. Stutz, M. L. and Pilkey, O. H. (2011). Openocean barrier islands: Global influence of climatic, oceanographic, and depostional settings. Journal of Coastal Research, 27(2), 207–222.
16. Борисенко, А.М. (1946). Количественный учет донной фауны Тендровского залива [ Borisenko, A. M. (1946). [Quantitative inventory of the bottom fauna of the Tendra Bay]. Karadag. 201 p. [In Russian].
17. Буданов, В. И., Ионин, А. С. (1953). Аккумулятивные формы и динамика берегов. Природа. № 5, 108–111. [Budanov, V. I., Ionin, A. S. (1953). Accumulative forms and coastal dynamics. Priroda. № 5, 108–111 pp.]. [In Russian].
18. Зенкович, В.П. (1960). Морфология и динамика советских берегов Черного моря. Т. ІІ (Северо-западная часть). Москва. АН СССР. 216 с. [Zenkovich, V. P., (1960). Morphology and dynamics of the Soviet shores of the Black Sea. T. II (North-western part). Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 216 p.]. [in Russian].
19. Леонтьев, О. К., Никифоров, Л. Г. (1965). О причинах планетарного распространения береговых баров. Океанология. Т. V. Вып. 4, 653–661 с.
[Leontiev, O. K., Nikiforov, L. G. (1965). On the reasons for the planetary spread of coastal bars. Okeanologiya, T. V, Vyp. 4, 653-661 p.] [In Russian].
20. Правоторов, И.А., (1966). Геоморфология лагунного побережья северо-западной части Черного моря (Изучение эволюции береговых форм гидрометеорологическим методом). Москва, Университет М.В. Ломоносова. 324 с. [Pravotorov, I. A., (1966). Geomorphology of the lagoon coast of the northwestern part of the Black Sea (Study of the evolution of coastal forms using the hydrometeorological method). Moscow, University M. V. Lomonosova, 324 p.]. [in Russian].
21. Шуйский, Ю.Д., Выхованец, Г.В. (1989). Экзогенные процессы развития аккумулятивных берегов в северо-западной части Черного моря. Москва. Недра. 198 с. [Shuisky, Yu. D., Vykhovanetz, G. V. (1989). Exogenous processes of development of accumulative shores in the North-Western part of the Black Sea. Moskva, Nedra, 198 pp.]. [In Russian].
22. Шуйський, Ю.Д., Вихованець, Г.В. (1999). Про динаміку гирл в берегових акумулятивних формах на узбережжі Чорного моря. Ерозія на берегах Чорного та Азовського морів. Київ. 44–48 с. [Shuisky, Yu.D., Vykhovanetz, G.V. (1999). On the dynamics of breaches located through coastal accumulative forms on the Black Sea coast. Erosion of the shores of the Black and Azov seas. Kyiv. 44–48]. [in Ukrainian].
Published
2023-08-16
Pages
41-48
Section
SECTION 2 NATURAL-GEOGRAPHICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCHES